Adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom
![adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom](https://cdn.educba.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Lightroom-vs-Photoshop.jpg)
Camera Raw is essentially Lightroom without the asset management database. Like BarryE, I prefer to use the Bridge > Camera Raw > Photoshop workflow. For just two Starbucks cups a month, I think it is a good deal. And any and all updates are automatic, so you never are working with last-year's software.
![adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom](https://www.designyourway.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/raw-editing-700x394.jpg)
![adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TlCNIQt_CNM/maxresdefault.jpg)
![adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom adobe photoshop vs photoshop lightroom](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/24/19/a4/2419a4c9411048fa7e62af02e0989fef.jpg)
For your 10 bucks you get Lightroom (cloud-based), LightroomClassic (computer-based), Photoshop, Bridge, and Camera Raw. However, you can do lots of editing just in Lightroom, especially if you just want to make changes to the overall image (like adjusting brightness, contrast and colour tones) or remove spots, red-eye, chromatic aberations compensate for lens distortion, etc.įor me, $10 a month for the Lightroom/Photoshop package is a good deal. For the ultimate in digital processing, you would use both Lightroom and Photoshop, starting with Lightroom and editing individual photos in Photoshop. Photoshop lets you create completely new images or combine any kind of graphic image with your digital photos, but making changes to more than one photo at a time requires batch processing and is not as intuitive as using Lightroom. In Lightroom you work from a visual catalog of all your photos, easily making changes to one or many photos, but you can't "paint" on your photos like you can with Photoshop. What about Photoshop? There is some overlap between processing your digital photos with Photoshop or Lightroom, but the general process is very different. You don't have to be a serious photographer to have more than 1 Terabyte of original digital photos and uploading your originals to the Internet for Adobe to store them for you takes longer than storing them on your own computer and may require a more expensive Internet connection than you currently have (or want to have) to provide a satisfactory experience using the program. Photoshop can rented by itself (without Lightroom, but with some minor apps like Adobe Fonts included) for more money than the Photography package (at least in some markets), or as part of Creative Cloud, which includes basically every piece of software Adobe currently makes available (for video production, developing websites, vector illustration, etc.) for more money than any of the other plans.Ĭonfusing, right? It only gets worse, there is Lightroom and Lightroom Classic Lightroom Classic stores your originals on your computer, Lightroom Classless stores your originals on the Internet. You can rent Lightroom separately from Photoshop or as part of a Photography package (which includes Photoshop, at least in some markets), and the monthly price depends on how much online storage comes with the package as well as whether or not you rent Lightroom by itself. You can create similar results like PS does with freeware like Gimp too, but the user interface of Gimp will demand a higher learning curve and some automated procedures PS offers won't be available (the endresult will be reproduceable but it will likely take more time to get there)Ĭan I just buy one of these?You can only rent either of these programs, the same company, Adobe, publishes both Lightroom and Photoshop and Adobe only offers a subscription these days, not a permanent license to these programs. Personally I am not a fan of subcription models and when I ever feel the need to move on from LR 5 I will probably give preverence to software from other suppliers like RAWTherapy or the like. PS gives you superior capabilities to modify your images and combine different images (blending them together like a multiple exposure, or using parts of multiple images to create a new one.), (I think there is also a way to preserve the original file but when you are inexperienced with PS, then there is a danger of destroying your original image with this software so be alert when and how you safe your work.) You can process single images and then quickly assign the same settings to the rest of the images you took at the same area with the same camera settings for instance (the original file will not be altered, you can test different versions without fear of destroying the original image). Set your camera RAW to DNG and you will likely not get compatibility problems even with older versions (new PEF files of the K-3iii will probably not work with an older software though).Įdit: LR is sufficient for 90% of my images. I think PS is only available as part of the subscription model (which will include LR too).Īn older LR version (LR 6) is still available as standalone software to buy, but you won't get updates for this version anymore (that said I still run version 5 and I am happy with it, but it depends on what you expect from the software).